You are on page 1of 39

Format for Self Assessment Report (SAR) for NBA Accreditation of Undergraduate Engineering Programme

_____________________________
(Name of the Programme)

________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________
(Name and Address of the College / Institute /University) (hereinafter, referred by Institute)

National Board of Accreditation New Delhi, India May 2011

Organization of the SAR :
The Self Assessment Report(SAR) should be submitted using the format which is organized in the following four parts: Part I: Part II: Institutional Summary for Criteria I, II and III. Department/Programme Summary for Criteria IV to X.

Part III: Curricula and syllabi for the degree programme along with Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs), Programme Outcomes and Assessment. Part IV: List of Documents to be made available during the accreditation visit. Abbreviations: CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 LYG LYGm1 CFY CFYm1 -----------Current Academic Year Current Academic Year minus one Current Academic Year minus two Latest Year of Graduation Latest Year of Graduation minus one Current Financial Year Current Financial Year minus one e.g., __2010 – 11___ e.g., __2009 – 10___ e.g., __2008 – 09___ e.g., __2007 – 08___ e.g., __2006 – 07___ e.g., __2010 – 11___ e.g., __2009 – 10___

Notes:
1. It would be greatly appreciated if precise and specific details, as requested in this format, are provided in tabular form and/or using bullets as far as possible. No detailed description should be included anywhere; do not include any detail/information which is not asked for. In case, you wish to add any data/information which is not asked for, kindly add in the annexures. 2. Include data for three consecutive years, unless otherwise specified.
3. Information sought is mostly meant to be the “Average” over sufficient samples, as

applicable. 4. In this manuscript, “Institution” is used interchangeably for college/Institute/ University and “Head of the Institution” for Principal/Director/Vice-Chancellor.

Version.3.0

May, 2011

Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page

2 of 39

CAY __________

LYG ___________

CFY ____________

Declaration
This Self Assessment Report (SAR) is prepared for the Current Academic Year (__________) and the Current Financial Year (_________) on behalf of the Institution. I certify that the information provided in this SAR is extracted from the records and to the best of my knowledge, is correct and complete. I understand that any false statement/information of consequence may lead to rejection of the application for accreditation for a period of two or more years. I also understand that the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) or its sub-committees will have the right to decide on the basis of the submitted SAR whether the Institution should be considered for an accreditation visit. If the information of consequence was found to be wrong during the visit or subsequent to grant of accreditation, NBA has right to withdraw the grant of accreditation and no accreditation will be allowed for a period of next two years or more.

Place: Date:

Signature, Name and Designation of the Head of the Institution with seal

Version.3.0

May, 2011

Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page

3 of 39

/ NGO / Private) / Private/ Other (specify)_______ I.4. if any). .0.3. if any . CFY CFYm1 CFYm2 Version.0 May. in tabular form: Year ……… ………(date) ……… Description Institution started with the following programmes (Intake strength) .(Central/State) / Grants-in-aid / Not-for-profit / Private-Self financing / Other(specify)______ I. . . Designation.0. Addition of new programmes.2.7. Financial Status : Govt. . Ownership Status : Govt. Telephone. increase in intake strength of the existing programmes and/or accreditation status . History of the Institution (including dates of introduction and number of seats of various programmes of study along with NBA accreditation. Mobile Numbers and E-mail ids of the contact person for NBA: I. .0. . External Sources of Funds : Name of the External Source ……………..0. NBA-AICTE Accreditation visits and accreditation granted.3. Name and Address of the Institution and affiliated University: I.6. Name. I.1. Nature of Trust / Society : _________________________________ List other Institutions/colleges run by the Trust/Society I.5. . .0. ……………..0. .PART I INSTITUTIONAL SUMMARY (Criteria I. .(Central/State) / Trust / Society (Govt. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 4 of 39 .0. II and III) I.

3.0. during the CAY and the previous CAYs (1st July to 30th June): Items Teaching Faculty in Engineering Teaching Faculty in Science & Humanities Non-teaching Staff Criterion I: Organization and Governance. Exclusive for this Institution Land _____acres sq.0.11.. Internally Acquired Funds : Name of the internal Source Student’s Fee …………….8.0. Development and Planning (100) I-I.1.0.Total Number of Employees _______ Male _______ Female _________ I. Total Number of Engineering Students _________Boys _______ Girls _______ Total Number of other Students.0.I.10 Basis/Criterion for Admission to the Institution: All India entrance / State level entrance / University entrance / 12th level mark sheet/ other (specify)__________________ I. basis of scholarship/assistance : Merit/Merit-cum-means/other ________ Total number ___________ Amount ____________ in CFY Total number ___________ Amount ____________ in CFY minus 1 Total number ___________ Amount ____________ in CFY minus 2 I.12.13.0 May. if any _________Boys _______ Girls _______ I.m.0. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 5 of 39 . Resources. CFY CFYm1 CFYm2 I.1 Campus Infrastructure and Facility (20)* I-I. built-up area and academic infrastructure (4) -Physical resource available A. Scholarships or any Financial Assistance provided to Students ? YES NO if provided. CAY Min Max CAYm1 Min Max CAYm2 Min Max Built-up floor space ___ Version. Institutional Support. Minimum and Maximum Number of Faculty and Staff on roll in the Engineering Institution.9.1 Land.

Transportation facility and canteen (4) Hostel for Boys? Yes / No Exclusive/Shared/Rented Number of Rooms _____ Number of accommodated students _____ Number in waiting ______ Hostel for Girls? Yes / No Exclusive/Shared/Rented Number of Rooms _____ Number of accommodated students _____ Number in waiting ______ Transport? Yes/No Exclusive/Public transport Number of Buses ___.2 Maintenance of academic infrastructure and facilities (4) *Assessment criterion/specification is available in AICTE website.5 Electricity. telecom facility. availability.2. green cover.B. .1. environment preservation.4 Hostel (Boys and girls). etc. barrierfree structure. in tabular form. Senate and all other Academic and Administrative bodies. Specify distinct features . functions and responsibilities. I-I. Shared with other institutions in this campus.1. quality.specific details in respect of installed capacity. 2011 6 of 39 .3 Ambience.Facility availed by___ % of students___&___ % of faculty Canteen? Yes/No Number of Canteen(s) _______ Sitting space _________ Daily Usage _______ I-I. if any Land _____acres sq.1. power backup. A few sample minutes of the meetings and action taken reports should be annexed. Built-up floor space ___ I-I.3.m. administrative setup and functions of various bodies (5) List Governing.2 Organization. .1 Governing body. Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page Version. frequency of the meetings and attendance therein. Governance and Transparency (20) I-I.0 May. … I-I. (4) Specify distinct features . water harvesting. etc.1. …… I-I. their memberships. . drinking water and security (4) -.

2005.2.I-I.3. year of publications. awareness among the employees/students.2 Defined rules.) Expenses in CFYm1 Expenses in CFYm2 Version. Total I-I. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 7 of 39 .2. I-I. provide details I-I. if any. staff-union..3 Budget Allocation. recruitment and promotional policies etc (5) List of the published rules. I-I.1 Adequacy of budget allocation (5) I-I.3.4 Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous information (5) – Dissemination and Availability of institute and programme specific information through the web – Information provisioning in accordance with Right To Information Act. Utilization and Public Accounting (15) Summary of current financial year’s budget and the actual expenditures incurred (exclusively for the institution) for three preceding financial years Item Acquisition of land.3.0 May.2. procedures. specify…. including faculty association. policies and procedures. availability on web etc. new buildings and infrastructural built-up Library Laboratory Equipment Laboratory consumables Teaching and Non-Teaching staff salary Travel Other.3 Utilization of allocated funds (5) Budgeted in CFY Expenses in CFY (till…….3 Decentralization in working including delegation of financial power and grievance redressal system (5) – List of faculty members who are administrators/decision makers for various responsibilities – Specify the mechanism and composition of grievance redressal system.

3. _____ Computerization for search. Library automation.I-I. availability of a qualified librarian and other staff. issue/return records ? Bar-coding used ? Lib services on internet/intranet ? INDEST or other similar membership ? specify ___________ Archival ___________ I-I. indexing.3. Reading space _____ sq m Number of seats in reading space ___ Number of users (issue book) ______ per day Number of users (Reading space) _______ per day Timings: Academic (Working day) __________ Academic (Weekend) __________ Vacation _______________ Number of library staff __________________ Number of library staff with degree in Library Mgmt. networking (4) * Assessment criterion/specification is available in AICTE website Carpet area of library ____ sq m.3 Scholarly journal subscription (4) Version. No Yes URL………………………………… I-I.2 Titles and volumes per title (4) Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Number of titles _________________Number of volumes _______________ Number of New Titles added CFYm2 CFYm1 CFY Number of New editions added Number of New Volumes added I-I.1 Library space and ambience. timings and usage. No Yes URL………………………………… CFYm1 ………………….4 Library (20) * I-I.4. online access.4.3 Availability of the audited statements through Institute’s web-site (5) CFYm3 …………………. No Yes URL……………………………… CFYm2 …………………. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 8 of 39 .0 May.4.

4 Digital library (4) Availability of Digital Library contents ? Yes No If available. Contents CFYm2 CFYm1 CFY I-I.5 Internet (5) Internet Provider ___________ Access Speed ? Poor Good Bandwidth ____________ Very Good Yes Yes No No 9 of 39 Availability Availability in an exclusive lab for Internet use ? Availability in most computing labs ? Version. magazines/journals. and miscellaneous contents (4) Year Books Expenditures Magazine / Magazines / Journals (for Journals (for hard copy soft copy subscription) subscription Comments Misc. Number of Courses ______ Number of e-Books ______ Any other____ ? Availability of an exclusive server ? Yes No Availability over intranet/internet ? Yes No Availability of exclusive space/room? Yes No Number of Users __________ per day.3.0 May.4. I-I.Year Number of Technical Magazines / Periodicals Number of total Technical Journals subscribed In In Hardcopy Softcopy Scholarly journal titles (in originals. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page . reprints) CFYm2 CFYm1 CFY I-I.4.5 Library expenditures on books.

Availability in departments and other units ? Availability in faculty rooms ? Institute’s own Email facility to faculty/students Security/privacy to Email/Internet users? Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No I-I.0 May. .7 Counseling and Emergency Medical Care and First-aid (10) I-I. their qualifications and availability Specify number of cases handled on per month basis I-I. I-I. and Availability of ambulance services (5) Number of Medical practitioners _______ Number of nursing staff ________ Specify Medical facility within the Institution ? Medical facility nearby ? Availability of ambulance services (response times and medical facility. I-I.6. .1 Availability of psychological and psychiatric counseling (5) Specify the counselor(s). . . . I-I.7. critical care).3..6.2 Medical staff to provide first-aid/medical help in emergency. . and such other facilities (3) Specify .3 Safety of Civil Structure (2) I-I. Number of ambulances within the Institution _____ Facility in ambulances _______ Response-time in calling ambulance services from outside ________ Version.6.6 Safety Norms and Checks (10) I-I.7.1 Checks for wiring and electrical installations for leakage and earthing (3) Specify . . 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 10 of 39 . . Fire fighting equipments and training.4 Handling of hazardous chemicals and such other activities (2) Specify .6.2 Fire fighting measurements : Effective safety arrangements with emergency/ multiple exits and ventilation/exhausts in auditoriums and large class rooms/labs. Availability of water.

II-I. self-learning and extra-curricular activities (5) Specify the time-table contents II-I.2 Published schedule in academic calendar for assignments/tests/examinations and distribution of corrected scripts (5) Items in Academic Calendar Conduct during the period or in the academic week Performance Feedback / Distribution of Scripts during the period or in the academic week Assignments… Tests… Mid-sem. Number of Students Software used Type of experiments Quality of instruments Lab Description ….2. laboratory manuals.1 Academic Process (15) II-I. labs. Examination End-sem.1. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 11 of 39 . Examination Other activities… II-I.1. …… Lab Manuals Version. Produce cases of rewards and penalty to students (may be to faculty too). quality and availability of measuring instruments.3..1 Basic Science/Engineering laboratories (Adequacy of space. list of experiments) (10) Space.1.Criterion II: Teaching and Learning Processes (100) II-I.3 Attendance Monitoring : Reward for good attendance and penalty for poor (5) System of attendance and how it is monitored and analyzed.1 Published time-table with sufficient hours for lectures.0 May.2 Academic Support Units and Common facilities for First Year Courses (20) II-I. number of students per batch.

1 Tutorial classes to address personal level doubts and queries : size of tutorial classes. 2011 YES NO 12 of Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 39 .3.3 Tutorial Classes/ Remedial Classes/ Mentoring (15) II-I.. …… Guidance / Learning II-I.2.3. Number of Students Number of experiments Quality of instruments Lab Manuals II-I.0 May.3.4 Language Laboratory (2) Space.2 Central computing laboratory (4) Computing Lab …… …… Space Number of Computers Variety of SWs Usage / Timings Lab Assistance? II-I. Number of Students Software Type of Used experiments Quality of instruments Language Lab ….2 Remedial classes and additional make-up tests to help academically weaker students : list of remedial classes. …… Space.3 Manufacturing practices (mechanical/electrical) workshop (4) Workshop Description …. hours per subject in timetable (5) Provision of Tutorial classes in time-table ? YES NO Tutorial Sheets ? YES NO Tutorial classes taken by : Faculty / Teaching Assistants / Senior Students / Other (specify)_______ Number of tutorial classes per subject ____ per week Number of students ____ per tutorial class Number of subjects with tutorials : 1st year ____ 2nd year _____ 3rd year ______ 4th year ______ II-I..2.2.II-I. schedule of classes/tests and students’ lists (5) Provision of Remedial Classes in Time Table ? Version.

3. .4 Teaching Evaluation Process : Feedback System (15) II-I.1 Design of proforma and process for feedback evaluation (5) Number of Feedback Items _____________ Number of Feedback levels_______ Space for descriptive feedback/suggestion etc. . .3.3 Mentoring system to help at individual levels (5) Type of Mentoring : Professional guidance/Career advancement/Course work specific/Lab specific/Total development/ Number of faculty mentors _________ Number of students __________ per mentor Frequency of Meeting: Weekly/ Monthly/ . 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 13 of 39 .Number of subjects having Remedial Classes ____ subjects out of total _____ subjects per semester Number of students having Remedial Classes _____ students out of total _____ students in a semester Number of hours of Remedial classes _______ per-subject per week Provision of Makeup Tests in Academic Calendar ? YES NO Number of subjects having Makeup Tests ______ subjects out of total ______ subjects per semester Number of students having Makeup Tests ______ students out of total ______ students in a semester Number of hours of Makeup Tests _______ per-subject per week II-I.0 May. ? YES NO Any consistency check? YES NO Any performance/attendance profile ? YES NO Frequency of feedback collection : Once/Twice in a semester Feedback collection : Hard-copy/Web-based II-I.per semester/ Need based/ other II-I.4. .4. if any (5) Feedback collected for all courses ? YES NO Specify the feedback collection process __________________________ Who collects the feedback? ______________________________ When feedback is collected ? ____________________________ Percentage of students participating _______________________ Specify the feedback analysis process _____________________________ Is this done manually ? YES NO What metrics are calculated ? _____________________________ What is inferred from the metrics ? _________________________ How are the comments used ?_____________________________ Version.2 Feedback analysis and reward/corrective measures taken.

5. management and impact ? II-I. Placement and Entrepreneurship Cell (10) II-I.6.0 May.3 Feedback mechanism from alumni.5.5.1 Generation of self-learning facilities.5 Self Learning and Learning beyond Syllabus (15) II-I. like hard-/soft-attitude of the instructor considered ? YES NO Was result considered? YES NO Number of awards in CAY ______ in CAYm1 ________ in CAYm2 _______ Number of corrective actions in CAY ______ in CAYm1 ________ in CAYm2 _______ II-I.6 Career Guidance. if any.3 Flexibility in academics with scope for self learning (5) Specify components II-I.Basis of reward/corrective measures.7 Co-curricular and Extra Curricular Activities (10) Version.6. if any _______________________________ II-I. management and impact ? II-I. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 14 of 39 .3.3 Entrepreneurship cell and incubation facility (2) Specify – facility. Training. parents and industry. industry interaction for training/internship/placement (4) Specify – facility.1 Effective career guidance services including counseling for higher studies (4) Specify – facility. motivation and scope for self-learning/learning-beyond-syllabus (5) Specify __________________________________ II-!.6. management and impact ? II-I. if any (5) Specify the mechanism of feedback collection and analysis _____________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Number of feedback received in CAY _____ in CAYm1 _____ in CAYm2 _______ Specify typical corrective actions taken. ____________________________ Were extraneous factors. and availability of materials for learning beyond syllabus (5) Specify self-learning mode _________________________________ and modules II-I.2 Training and placement facility with training and placement officer (TPO).2 Possibility.4.

(5) Specify – facilities and usages in brief ? II-I.. management and usages ? Criterion III: Students’ Admission and First Year Performance (75) III-I..3. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 15 of 39 .7. facilities and qualified sports instructors (5) Specify – facility.1.1 Co-curricular and extra-curricular activities.. admitted on management quota/otherwise (N2) Number of total admitted students in the Institute (N1 + N2) CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3 III-I.II-I. e. cultural activities etc.2 Admission Quality (10) Divide the total admitted ranks (or percentage-marks) into 5 or a few more meaningful ranges Rank Range Above 98 percentile 95 – 98 percentile 90 – 95 percentile 80 – 90 percentile …. Admitted without rank CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3 Tabular data for estimating Student Teacher Ratio and Faculty Qualification for FIRST YEAR Common Courses List of faculty members teaching first year courses: Version.2 Sports grounds. admitted on merit (N1) Number of students.g. NCC/ NSS. ….1 Students Admission (15) III-I.7.0 May.1.1 Admission Intake (5) Item Sanctioned Intake Strength in the Institute (N) Number of students.

4 Academic Performance in First Year Common Courses (20) Academic Performance = 20 * FYSI where FYSI = First Year Success Index = (No.5 * Number of students who cleared all but one subject in a single attempt) DIVIDED BY (Total Number of students admitted in the first year) Item Version. Tech.3 Assessment of Faculty Qualification teaching First Year Common Courses (FYFQ) (20) Assessment of Qualification = 2*(10 * x + 6 * y + 4 * z) / N Where X = Number of Faculty Members with Ph.3. D y = Number of Faculty Members with M. 2011 CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3 16 of Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 39 . Assessment Number of students (Approved intake strength) Number of faculty members (considering fractional load) FYSTR Assessment = 20 * 25 * 0./M.Sc. Tech.Name of Faculty Qualification Designation Date of joining institution Dept./M.A.0 May.8 / FYSTR (Max. Year CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY Average Assessment of Faculty Qualification (FYFQ) x y z N Assessment of faculty qualification III-I.C. Phil z = Number of Faculty Members with B. E / M.A N = Total Number of Faculty Members (considering fractional load) or Number of Faculty needed for FYSTR of 25. is20) III-I./NET-Qualified/M.2 Assessment of First-Year Student Teacher Ratio (FYSTR) of 25 or Superior (20) Three years of data for first year courses to calculate the Student Teacher Ratio (FYSTR): Year CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY Av. whichever is higher./M. of students who have cleared all the subjects in a single attempt + 0. E / B. with which associated Distribution of teaching load (%-age) 1st Year UG PG III-I.

3.5y) / N Av. FYSI = __________ Version.Number of students admitted in First Year (N) Number of students who have cleared all subjects in single attempt (x) Number of students who have cleared all subject but one subject in single attempt (y) First Year Success Index (FYSI) = (x + 0. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 17 of 39 .0 May. FYSI = ___________________________________ Academic Performance = 20 * Av.

UG…. Total Number of Students _____________ Boys __________ Girls __________ D. Minimum and Maximum number of faculty and staff on roll during the current and previous two academic years (1st July to 30th June) in the Department : Items Teaching Faculty in the Department Teaching Faculty with the Programe Non-teaching Staff Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page CAY Min Max CAYm1 Min Max CAYm2 Min Max Version.3.2 Name.PART II Department / Programme Summary (Criteria IV to X) D. Designation.0.0.1 Name and Address of the Department D. MCA PG…..0.4 List of the Programmes / Departments which share human resources and/or the facilities of this Department / Programmes (in %) D.0. which are run by the department along with NBA accreditation. in tabular form: Programme of Study UG in……. Telephone Numbers and E-mail ids of the contact person for NBA: D. …. …… D... 2011 18 of 39 . Description Started with _____ seats in _____ Intake increased to _____ in _____ Intake increased to _____ in _____ …… ….0.3 History of the Department (including dates of introduction and Number of seats of various programmes of study.7.0.0. if any).5.0 May.6. Total Number of Employees _____________ Male __________ Female _________ D.

3.D. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 19 of 39 .0.0 May. Summary of Budget for the CFY and the Actual Expenditures Incurred in the CFYm1 and CFYm2 (exclusively for this Programme in the Department) Items Budgeted in CFY Actual expenses in CFY (till…) Budgeted Actual Expenses in CFYm1 in CFYm1 Budgeted Actual Expenses in in CFYm2 CFYm2 Laboratory Equipments SW purchase Laboratory consumables Maintenance and spares Travel Miscellaneous expenses for academic activities Total Criterion IV : Students’ Performance in the Programme (75) Admission Intake in the Programme Item Sanctioned Intake Strength in the program (N) Number of total admitted students in first year minus Number of students migrated to other programmes at the end of 1st year (N1) Number of laterally admitted students in 2nd year in the same batch (N2) Number of total admitted students in the program (N1 + N2) CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3 IV-P.1 Success Rate (20) Provide data for the past 7 batches of students (Successfully completed implies Zero Backlogs) Number of Students Admitted in 1st year + Admitted laterally in 2nd year (N1 + N2) Numbers of Students successfully completed 1st year Numbers of Students successfully completed 2nd year Numbers of Students successfully completed 3rd year Numbers of Students successfully completed 4th year Year of Entry (in reverse chronological order CAY Version.8.

0 May.0 Version. SI = ___________________________________ Success Rate = 20 * Av. SI = _________________ IV-P.3.2 Academic Performance (20) Academic Performance Where API = 2 * API = Academic Performance Index = Mean of Cumulative Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point CGPA System OR = Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students / 10 LYG (CAYm4) LYGm1 (CAYm5) LYGm2 (CAYM6) Item Approximating the API by the following mid-point analysis 9 < Number of students with CGPA < 10.0 8 < Number of students with CGPA < 9.CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3 CAYm4 (LYG) CAYm5 (LYGm1) CAYm6 (LYGm2) Success Rate = 20 * Mean of Success Index (SI) for past 3 batches SI = (Number of students who cleared the program in the minimum period of course duration) DIVIDED BY (Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and laterally admitted in 2nd year) Item Number of students admitted in the corresponding First Year + laterally admitted in 2nd year Number of students who have graduated in 4 years Success Index (SI) LYG (CAYm4) LYGm1 (CAYm5) LYGm2 (CAYM6) Av. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 20 of 39 .

CAYm1 and CAYm2 IV-P.25 * y) / N Where x = Number of students placed.4.4. 2011 21 of 39 . subject to Max. Assessment Points = ________________ IV-P. design contests etc. API = ___________ IV-P. and their achievements (3) Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page Version.3 Placement and Higher Studies (20) Assessment Points = 20 * (x + 1.0 May. y = Number of students admitted for higher studies with valid qualifying scores/ranks.1 Professional societies/ chapters and organizing engineering events (3) List the above in Tabular form IV-P. API = ______________ Academic Performance = 2 x Av.4 Professional Activities (15) Provide data for the past 3 years – CAY.2 Organization of paper contests. N = Total number of students who were admitted in the batch including lateral entry.Total Approximating API by Mid-CGPA Mean of CGPA/Percentage of all the students (API) Av. Item Number of Admitted students corresponding to LYG including lateral entry (N) Number of students who obtained jobs as per the record of placement office (x1) Number of students who found employment otherwise at the end of the final year (x2) x = x1+ x2 Number of students who went for higher studies with valid qualifying scores/ranks (y) Assessment Point LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Av. Assessment Points = 20.3.

1 Student Teacher Ratio (STR) (20) : STR is desired to be 15 or superior Assessment = 20 * 15 * 0. Where STR = Student Teacher Ratio = (x + y + z) / N1 Where x = Number of students in 2nd year of the program y = Number of students in 3rd year of the program z = Number of students in 4th year of the program N1 = Total Number Faculty Members in the program (by considering fractional load) Year CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY Av.4 Entrepreneurship initiatives. Assessment x y z x+y+z N1 STR Assessment (Max.8 / STR .4. which fetch awards by students in the events/conferences organized by other institutes.3.5 Publications and awards in inter institute events by students of the programme of study (3) Include a Table having those publications. (3) List the above publications along with the names of the editors. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 22 of 39 .2 to V-P. innovations (3) Specify the efforts and achievements IV-P.8. publishers etc.4.0 May. the denominator term (N) is computed as follows:-Version. is 20) For Item Nos. IV-P. product designs. Criterion V: Faculty (150) List of Faculty: Exclusively for the Program / Shared with other Programs Name Qualification Designation Distribution of Number of IPRs R & D Holding Interof the University and Date teaching load (%) research and an action Faculty and year of of Joining publications in Consul.subject to Max.3 Publication of technical magazines.incubawith graduation the journals and tancy tion outside 1st P Institution conferences work unit world UG Y G since joining with amount V-P. Include a tabulated list of all other student publications in a separate annexure. newsletters etc. Assessment of 20. V-P.List the above in Tabular form IV-P.4.

4 Faculty Retention (20) Assessment = 4 * RPI / N Where RPI = Retention Point Index = Points assigned to all Faculty Where Points assigned to a faculty = 1 point for each year of experience at the Institute but not exceeding 5.2 Faculty Cadre Ratio (20) Assessment = 20 * CRI Where CRI = Cadre Ratio Index = 2.3. 2011 y N FQI Assessment CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY 23 of Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 39 . Tech z = Number of Faculty Members with B. N1 = Total Number of Faculty Members in the programme (considering the fractional load). (N1. Tech. N2 = Number of Faculty positions needed for Student Teacher Ratio (STR) of 15. Year N1 N2 N = Max. x CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY Av.0.0 May. CRI = 1. y = Number of Faculty Members with M.N2) CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY V-P. N2}.25 ( 2x + y ) / N .3 Faculty Qualifications (30) Assessment = 3 * FQI Where FQI = Faculty Qualification Index = (10 * x + 6 * y + 4 * z) / N Where x = Number of Faculty Members with Ph.subject to Max. Assessment V-P./M. Item Version. E / M. where x = Number of professors in the programme y = Number of associate professors in the programme Year CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY Av.where N = Maximum {N1. Assessment x y N CRI Assessment V-P.Sc. E / B. D.

Name of faculty (contributing to FRP) …. Assessment V-P. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 24 of 39 .5 Faculty Research Publications (20) Assessment of FRP = 4 * Sum of the Research Publication Points scored by each Faculty member DIVIDED BY (N) Guidelines: A faculty member scores at most 5 Research publication points depending upon the quality of the research papers and books published in the past 3 years.0 May. is of the current institution. Include a list of all such publications and IPRs along with details of DOI.3. published by well known publishers. 5 per faculty) CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY V-P. Assessment FRP Points (Max.Number of faculty with less than ly (x0) Number of faculty with 1y <= period <2y (x1) Number of faculty with 2y <= period <3y (x2) Number of faculty with 3y <= period <4y (x3) Number of faculty with 4y <= period <5y (x4) Number of faculty with more than 5y (x5) N RPI = x1 + 2x2 + 3x3 + 4x4 + 5x5 Assessment Av. Sum N (Number of faculty positions required for an STR of 15) Assessment FRP = 4x Sum/N Av. in the published papers/books. etc. and (ii) the faculty member’s affiliation.. Version. publisher.. FIPR includes awarded national/international patents. month/year. design and copyrights. …… …….6 Faculty Intellectual Property Rights (10) Assessment of FIPR = 2 * Sum of the FIPR points scored by each Faculty member DIVIDED BY (N) Guidelines: A faculty member scores at most 5 FIPR points. The research papers considered are those (i) which can be located on Internet and/or are included in hard-copy volumes/ proceedings.

2 points for interaction with State Level Institutions and others. 5 per faculty) CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY V-P.8 Faculty Interactions with Outside World (10) Assessment = 2 * Sum of FIP by each faculty DIVIDED BY (N) Guidelines : A faculty member gets at the most 5 Interaction Points. 3 points for funding by private sector. 4 points for funding by State Agency. as given below: 5 points for interaction with a well known Institution abroad. 1 lakh:5 points for funding by National Agency. …… ……. Assessment V-P. …… Sum N Assessment FPPC = 4x Sum/N Av. 3 points for interaction with Institution/Industry (not covered) above.0 May. A suggestive scheme is given below for a minimum amount of Rs. 5 per faculty) CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY Av. Name of faculty (contributing to FPPC) …. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 25 of 39 . Point to be warded. Assessment FPPC Points (Max. Institution of Eminence in India or National Research Labs.3.7 Externally funded R & D Projects and Consultancy Work (20) Assessment of R&D and Consultancy Projects = 4 * Sum of FPPC by each faculty DIVIDED BY (N) Guidelines : A faculty member gets atmost 5 points. Sum N Assessment FIPR = 2x Sum/N FIPR Points (Max.. which result in joint efforts in publication of books/research paper. pursuing externally funded R & D/consultancy projects Version..Name of faculty (contributing to FIPR) …. are for those activities. and 2 points for funding by the sponsoring Trust/Society. depending upon the amount.. depending upon the type of Institution or R&D Lab or Industry.

seminars. Name of faculty (contributing to FIP) ….. multimedia projectors.2 Teaching aids – black/white-board.1 Adequate number of rooms for lectures (core/electives)..1. exits.1. (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table VI-P. tutorials. conditions of chairs/benches. lighting. Tutorial rooms Seminar Room Number Meeting room Number Faculty rooms (n) Usage Class room for 2 Year nd Shared / Exclusive? Capacity Rooms Equipped with …. meeting space… VI-P.and/or development of semester-long course/teaching modules. etc for the program (10) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table VI-P. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 26 of 39 . Book rack. etc. Internet.0 May. …. and such other amenities/facilities (5) Version. PC. …… Sum N Assessment FIP = 2x Sum/N Av.. seminar and conference halls: (Entries in the following table are sampler entries) Room Description Class Room Number ….3 Acoustics. faculty rooms. Assessment FIP Points CAYm2 CAYm1 CAY Criterion VI: Facilities and Technical Support (75) Description of Class rooms. ….1.1 Class Rooms in the Department (20) VI-P. class room size. air circulation. ambiance.3.

(5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table VI-P.2.3.3.2.2 Faculty Rooms in the Department (15) VI-P.0 May. internet. Number of Students Number of experiments Qualify of instruments Lab manuals VI-P.1 Availability of individual faculty rooms (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table VI-P.2 Availability of computing facilities available exclusively in the department (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table VI-P.4 Equipments to run experiments and their maintenance. ….3.2 Room equipped with white/black board. and such other amenities/facilities (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table VI-P. Size of the laboratories.1 Adequate well equipped labs to run all the program specific curriculum (10) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table VI-P. support within and beyond working hours (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table VI-P. Number of students per experimental set up.Assessment based on the information provided in the above table and the inspection thereof VI-P.3.3 Availability of laboratories and students project labs with tech. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 27 of 39 .3 Usage of room for discussion/counseling with students (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table and the inspection thereof Curriculum Lab Description ….4 Technical Manpower Support in the Department (15) Version..2. overall ambience etc.3. Exclusive use/Shared? Space.3 Laboratories in the Department to Meet the Curriculum Requirements as well as the PEOs (25) VI-P. computer.

4.0 May. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 28 of 39 .1 Items Success Index LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Aggregate VII-P.3 Improvement in Student Teacher Ratio (10) From V-P. R & D work and Consultancy work (10) Version.2 Improvement in Academic Performance Index of Students (10) From IV-P. skill-up gradation and professional advancement (5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table Criterion VII: Continuous Improvements (75) VII-P.4 Enhancement of Faculty Qualification Index (10) From V-P. Staff …… …….3.3 Items FQI LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Aggregate VII-P.2 Incentives.2 Items API LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Aggregate VII-P.4.1 Items STR LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Aggregate VII-P.5 Improvement in Faculty Research Publications.1 Availability of adequate and qualified technical supporting staff for program specific labs (10) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table VI-P.Name of the Tech.1 Improvement in Success Index of Students (10) From IV-P. Designation (Pay-scale) Exclusive / Shared Work? Date of Joining Qualification At Joining Now? Other Technical Skills gained? Responsibility VI-P.

From V-P. if any. since establishment (5) Specify the overall improvements: Specify the strengths/ weakness In CAYm2 … In CAYm1 …. which are strengthened Comments.8 Overall Improvements since Last Accreditation.7 Items FRP FPPC LYG LYGm1 LYGm2 Aggregate VII-P... VII-P. Any other contributory Inst. if any Version..5 and V-P. Any other contributory Inst.6 Continuing Education (10) Specify the contributory efforts made by the faculty by developing the course/lab modules. In CAY Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page Improvement brought in Contributed by List the PEO(s). otherwise. 2011 29 of 39 .3.0 May./ Industry Developed / organized by Duration Resource Persons Target Audience Usage and citation etc. In CAY …. for continuing education : Module Description …… ……. conducting short-term courses/workshops etc. In CAYm1 ……..7 New Facility Created (10) Specify new facilities created for strengthening the curriculum and/or meeting the PEOs: Module Description In CAYm2 ……. Duration VII-P./ Industry Developed / organized by Resource Persons Target Audience Usage and citation etc.

Innovation. so that the PEOs are satisfied. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 30 of 39 .3. If enough labhttps://www.scribd.com/design/experimentation components are not included in the curriculum provided by the affiliated university then the Institution should make additional efforts to impart such knowledge by covering such aspects through “contents beyond syllabi”. VIII-P. so that the PEOs are satisfied. if any should be specified including e Tutorials. If such components are not included in the curriculum provided by the affiliated university then the Institution should make additional efforts to impart such knowledge by covering such aspects through “contents beyond syllabi”..3 Laboratory and Project Work (20) Assessment must evaluate the balance between laboratory /project work and theory. humanities.1 Contents of Basic Science. and Breadth (30) Assessment must evaluate the balance in the composition of basic science..0 May.…. …… Theory Lab Science / HSS / Professional Core. …… Criterion VIII: Curriculum (100) List all the course modules along with their objectives and outcomes (Ref. Elective or Breadth? PEOs specified by Affiliating Institution Additional theory / lab / assignments / tests needed to meet objectives? Comments VIII-P. Part III): Units Course …… …….2 Content Delivery (30) Assessment must evaluate the effectivity of teaching content including etutorials and delivery. Humanities and Professional Courses – Core. Version. Elective. professional courses and their distribution in core and elective and breadth offerings. VIII-P.

2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 31 of 39 .VIII-P.0 May. Version.4 Additional Contents to Bridge Curriculum Gaps (20) Assessment must evaluate program specific contents which are added to bridge curriculum gaps across the courses in order to achieve PEOs and the specific course objectives.3.

Produce sample course files (best and average quality). …. In case of an affiliated institution. Produce sample laboratory assignment sheets (best and average quality).Criterion IX: Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs) (150) List all the course modules along with their PEOs (Ref.0 May. …. Produce sample (best and average quality) examination/tests question papers. assignment sheets along with model solutions to assess how the PEOs are achieved through such evaluations.. and their mapping with (i) content delivery and (ii) knowledge gained through theory classes and laboratory work. and take-home work (assignments and independent study). IX-P..g. Part III) along with Coursefiles etc.2 PEOs Mapping with Content Delivery – Theory and Labs (30) Assessment must be based on the PEOs defined for a course or a set of courses. and their mapping with examinations.. strengthening. there may be a provision for additional/supplementary tests/examinations in order to Version.. handouts showing course deliveries mapped to the identified PEOs. Theory Lab Assignments / Tests / Exams Project / Independent Study Comments (e.: PEOs Assessment (Poor / Average / Good / Excellent) Course Units (Theory – Tutorial – Lab) ….3 PEOs Mapping with Evaluation (Examinations/Tests/Assignments) (30) Assessment must be based on the PEOs defined for a course or a set of courses. This exercise is aimed at assessing the possibility and provision for PEOs’ mapping with content delivery and the capability of the Institution to do so. …. IX-P. re-working. there may be a provision for teaching additional topics and holding supplementary tests/examinations in order to achieve the identified PEOs. In case of an affiliated institution.3.1 PEOs Mapping with Curriculum (30) Assessment must be based on the PEOs defined for a course or a set of courses. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 32 of 39 .. class tests. and their mapping with the curriculum. needs. Theory Lab Assignments / Tests / Exams Project / Independent Study IX-P. etc.

cater to additional subject topics. attempts must be made to document the effectivity of the mapping processes. provision and capability of the institution to do the above in order to achieve the stated PEOs.. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 33 of 39 . In CAY ….. (ii) the state-of-the-art technology used in execution. This exercise is aimed at assessing the possibility. Version. Area of Specialization Project Supervisor(s) Contribution / Achievements / Research Output Matching with stated PEOs Project Title Publication IX-P. Include a list of five best and average projects from each of the three years – CAY. This continuous process may also refine/revise the targeted PEOs and their mappings. and (v) the coverage of border areas of the programme. CAYm1 and CAYm2 – along with their contributions. required for achieving the identified PEOs.0 May. Name of the Student(s) In CAYm2 …….5 Continuous Improvement in the Process of PEOs Mapping and Assessment (30) Viewing the process of PEOs’ mapping to the above mentioned criteria as a continuously improving process over the years. In CAYm1 ……. (iii) their relevance to industry and academics. IX-P. (iv) the use and development of theoretical and experimental methods.3.4 PEOs Mapping with Final Year Project work (30) Assessment of final year students’ projects must be done considering criteria such as – (i) their quality.

3. nature of companies.1 Documented process and assessment from Industries (10) Evaluation must be done based on documented processes for repeatedly assessing the outcomes by the relevant industries.0 May.4 Assessment of achievements as disseminated in media/public fora (10) Assessment of achievements.1 Demonstration of Attainment of the Mandatory a-to-k outcomes (Ref. X-P. faculty and placement attainments. Part III) (50) Evaluation is based on outcome assessment from students.1.1.1.) must be evaluated as per documented processes. X-P. X-P.1.1 Assessment of outcomes from students’ attainment (15) Academic and professional achievements by students in terms of a-to-k-outcomes must be evaluated out as per documented processes. as published in the media/public fora of repute (excluding the internal publications of the Institute. higher studies etc.2 Documented process and assessment from Almuni (10) Evaluation must be done based on documented processes for repeatedly assessing the outcomes by the qualified and relevant alumni. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 34 of 39 .2.2. X-P.3 Assessment of outcomes from placement (10) Assessment of achieved objectives as revealed through placement data (type of jobs. Version. X-P. its media partners) must be done based on their impact.3 Documented process and assessment from Professional Bodies (10) Evaluation must be done based on documented processes for repeatedly assessing the outcomes by the applicable and recognized national/international professional bodies.2.Criterion X: Programme Outcomes and Assessment (100) X-P. X-P.2 Assessment of outcomes due to faculty contributions and achievements (15) Academic and professional contributions of the faculty leading to a-to-k-outcomes and their achievements must be evaluated as per documented processes. X-P.2 Assessment of Outcomes by External Stakeholders (30) X-P.

2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 35 of 39 .3.0 May.X-P.3 Effectivity and Efficiency of the Mechanism/Procedure for Continuous Review and Outcome Measurements (20) Viewing the review and outcome measurement processes as continuously improving. Version. attempts must be made to document the effectivity and efficiency of the mechanism/procedures.

3. Programme Outcomes as attainable through a course module or a group of course modules. 2. or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic. if needed. social. The following excerpts are taken from the ABET’s Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programmes:-Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs) – Programme educational objectives are broad statements that describe the career and professional accomplishments that the programme is preparing the graduates to achieve. Version. Syllabi. (c) an ability to design a system. environmental. to be provided to meet the outcomes with the course objectives. and 5. These relate to the skills.PART III Curriculum. How to make provisions for the additional contents. political. Engineering programmes must demonstrate that their students attain the following outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics. in the academic calendar. and engineering. and an assessment and evaluation process that periodically documents and demonstrates the degree to which these objectives are attained. science. the course modules and/or groups of course modules in the programme. Programme Outcomes – Programme outcomes are narrower statements that describe what students are expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation. PEOs and Outcomes In this part of SAR. Defined outcomes vis-à-vis the subset of achievable outcomes for a course module and/or group of course modules. knowledge. ethical. 4.0 May. (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments. Each programme for which an institution seeks accreditation or reaccreditation must have in place: (a) (b) (c) published educational objectives that are consistent with the mission of the institution and these criteria. Additional contents beyond the syllabi. a process that periodically documents and demonstrates that the objectives are based on the needs of the programme's various constituents. component. should provide the following information: 1. 3. as well as to analyze and interpret data. Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs) and Course Objectives. if needed to bridge the gaps. and behaviors that students acquire in their matriculation through the programme. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 36 of 39 .

an ability to identify. and societal context. an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. Evaluation – Evaluation is one or more processes for interpreting the data and evidence accumulated through assessment practices. and (k) an ability to use the techniques. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global. Version.0 May. environmental. Assessment – Assessment is one or more processes that identify. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.health and safety. skills. (i) a recognition of the need for. manufacturability. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 37 of 39 . and prepare data to evaluate the achievement of programme outcomes and programme educational objectives. and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. formulate. Programme outcomes must foster attainment of programme educational objectives.3. and an ability to engage in life-long learning. (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Programme outcomes are outcomes (a) through (k) plus any additional outcomes that may be articulated by the programme. Evaluation determines the extent to which programme outcomes or programme educational objectives are being achieved and results in decisions and actions to improve the programme. There must be an assessment and evaluation process that periodically documents and demonstrates the degree to which the programme outcomes are attained. collect. and solve engineering problems. an ability to communicate effectively. (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues. economic. and sustainability.

) of the Institution I.PART IV List of documents / records to be made available during the visit (Records of three years to be made available. Medical care records and usages of ambulance etc.11. I. I.6 Placement and higher studies data (3y data) P. labs I. Representative minutes and action-taken reports of a few meetings of such bodies along with the list of current faculty members who are members of such bodies.3. evaluation schemes etc. conferences organized etc. Financiers etc. I.8 List of students’ papers along with hard-copies of the publications.7 Professional society activities. Academic calendar. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 38 of 39 .12. Library resources – books and journal holdings.6.9.8. if any P.0 May. Grade point (CGPA) (3y data of students CGPA/percentage) P. I.1 NBA accreditation reports of the past visits. Parents.17. I. Informative web site I.10. Programme Specific P.. Industries. First year results.3 Admission – seats filled and ranks (3y data) P. Rules. analysis and corrective actions I. list of additional topics to meet PEOs and outcomes. I. professional society publications/magazines etc.16.7. wherever applicable) Institute Specific I. assignments. Senate and other Academic and Administrative bodies. Records of safety checks and critical installations I. Set of question papers.14.4. Budgeted allocation and utilization : Audited statement of accounts I. P.2.g. built-plan and approval etc.5 Av. policies and procedures published by the Institution including service book and academic regulations and other along with the proof that the employees/students are aware of the rules and procedures. schedule of tutorial and makeup classes I. List of faculty who teach first year courses along with their qualifications I. Course handouts/files along with PEOs. Composition of GC/GB. their functions and responsibilities. computing and manufacturing etc.13. Listing of core.5. Alumni. Documented feedback received from the stake-holders (e. events.2 Department budget and allocations of the past 3 years P. I. List of all the meetings held in the past 3 years along with the attendance records.3. Records of T & P and career and guidance cells I.15. Version. Feedback proforma. Land papers.1.4 List/Number of students who clear the programme in 4y (3y data) P.

sample appointment letters.22 Curriculum. P.23 Known gaps in the curriculum vis-à-vis PEOs and Outcomes P.20 Records of new programme specific facility created.12 Faculty list with designation. if any P.19 List of short-term courses. if any P.17 List of programme specific labs and computing facility within dept.0 May.13 List of faculty publications along with DOIs and publication/citation details P. interaction details P. R & D. PEO/Course objectives and Outcomes. faculty rooms.18 List of non-teaching staff with their appointment letters etc P.25 Course files. joining date. salary details.11 Faculty details with their service books.16 List of class rooms. plan of course delivery. *** Version. question papers.24 List of contents beyond syllabi and schedule in academic calendar.P. if any P. assignments. promotion and award letters/certificates P. workshop arranged and course-modules developed P. 2011 Any alteration in the contents will make the document liable to be cancelled Page 39 of 39 .21 Records of overall programme specific improvements. list of experiments etc.14 List of R & D and consultancy projects along with approvals and project completion reports P.15 List and proofs of faculty interaction with outside world P.9 Sample best and average project reports/theses P. P. P. qualification. publication.3.10 Details of faculty student ratio P.